Jump to content


Photo

Best Bios For Xecuter 2.6?


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 gojirarocks

gojirarocks

    X-S Enthusiast

  • Members
  • 10 posts

Posted 03 February 2006 - 05:54 PM

N00b here! What is the best BIOS for the Xecuter 2.6? Should I use the Xecuter MULTI VERSION (v5035) or the Evox MULTI VERSION (vM8_Plus).

I plan on using Evox as my dash so will the Ebox BIOS be a better choice or will it pretty much not matter?

Xbox is a v1.0

Thanks all...


MODERATOR PLEASE DELETE THIS. IT GOT POSTED TWICE.

Edited by gojirarocks, 03 February 2006 - 06:00 PM.


#2 abrocky

abrocky

    X-S X-perience

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 363 posts
  • Xbox Version:v1.6

Posted 03 February 2006 - 06:02 PM

Use the X2 bios for the chip, latest as you have already discovered is the X2_5035.
Remember to use the correct version for you xbpox version:
X2_5035_old for non-1.6 consoles
X2_5035_16plus for any 1.6 xbox version

remember you will also need to FTP across the ini file that goes with the bios, in orfer for it to look in the correct partition for the installed dashboard etc.

#3 gojirarocks

gojirarocks

    X-S Enthusiast

  • Members
  • 10 posts

Posted 03 February 2006 - 06:21 PM

Wow thanks. I didn't know that part!

#4 .:Dino:.

.:Dino:.

    X-S Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,811 posts
  • Location:Milton Keynes, England
  • Xbox Version:v1.4
  • 360 version:v4.0 (jasper)

Posted 03 February 2006 - 06:38 PM

dont post multiple threds dry.gif

#5 elborak

elborak

    X-S Expert

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 690 posts

Posted 03 February 2006 - 06:49 PM

QUOTE(.:Dino:. @ Feb 3 2006, 12:45 PM) View Post
dont post multiple threds
I'm sure this was accidental. XS has been slow as sludge for the past couple of days and posting frequently gets timeouts, leading to multiple posts.

#6 gojirarocks

gojirarocks

    X-S Enthusiast

  • Members
  • 10 posts

Posted 03 February 2006 - 06:52 PM

Indeed t'was accidental...

Edited by gojirarocks, 03 February 2006 - 06:52 PM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users