Jump to content


Photo

Two PS3 Linux Performance Tweaks


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 PS3Scene

PS3Scene

    X-S Freak

  • Admin
  • 1,453 posts

Posted 19 January 2008 - 07:10 AM

Two PS3 Linux Performance Tweaks
Posted by XanTium | 19-1-2008 1:10 EST

 
From pslegion.com:


First, bring up a terminal.
Applications > Accessories > Terminal

Then, in the window that comes up, type
sudo sysctl -w vm.swappiness=10

To make the change permanent, do the following:
in the terminal, type
sudo gedit /etc/sysctl.conf
(if you don't have gedit, type sudo apt-get install gedit, then perform the above step)

In the sysctl.conf file, add this line at the bottom of the page:
vm.swappiness=10

Afterwards, either click File > Save
Or just click the Save icon.
Close the window afterwards.

Congratulations! You just forced Linux to use the PS3's RAM more often instead of virtual RAM on the Hard Drive (known as swap file...it's 100 times slower than RAM access).


Full Story: pslegion.com (check here for 2nd tweak)






#2 stevenalvarado

stevenalvarado

    X-S Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 281 posts
  • Location:Costa Rica PlayStation3 Version: none Nintendo Wii Version: v4.1u
  • Xbox Version:v1.0
  • 360 version:v3.0 (falcon)

Posted 19 January 2008 - 07:54 PM

Iīm sorry but thatīs difficult to even guess thatīs the way it should be made.

Why linux is so hard to use?

#3 throwingks

throwingks

    X-S Freak

  • Head Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,957 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Xbox Version:v1.4
  • 360 version:v4.0 (jasper)

Posted 20 January 2008 - 12:08 AM

There is no need for gedit. You can just echo the command in.

Edited by throwingks, 20 January 2008 - 12:51 AM.


#4 d-range

d-range

    X-S Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 254 posts

Posted 20 January 2008 - 05:19 PM

Why would you want to spoil your precious 256MB RAM on swap space? If you have a task that doesn't fit in main memory, causing parts of it to be swapped out, this is not going to improve that, it might actually make make things worse. And if you have only tasks that *do* fit in main memory, then swapping will not be the main performance bottleneck anyway.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users