Jump to content


Photo

Obama Strikes Pakistan


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Reaper527

Reaper527

    X-S Knowledgebase

  • Head Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,499 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA
  • Xbox Version:v1.0
  • 360 version:v3.0 (falcon)

Posted 23 January 2009 - 11:06 PM

http://www.cbsnews.c...in4749317.shtml

QUOTE

Officials in Pakistan are now reporting two suspected U.S. missile strikes in Pakistan.

They say as many as 18 people died in the attacks near the Afghan border. These mark the first such strikes since President Barack Obama was inaugurated.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs repeatedly and adamantly refused to comment today on the reported U.S. air strikes.

In response to several questions, notes CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller, Gibbs said the strikes were something he is just not going to talk about.

The first attack hit the village of Zharki in North Waziristan, near where al Qaeda militants hide out.

Officials said a drone fired three missiles in about 10 minutes, destroying two buildings and killing 10 people. An intelligence officer said at least five victims were foreign militants.

Hours later, a second missile hit a house in the same region, killing eight more people.

The missile strikes are the latest in a barrage of more than 30 in the region since the middle of last year.

Pakistan's pro-U.S. leaders had expressed hope President Obama would halt the attacks, which have reportedly killed several top al Qaeda operatives but triggered anger at the government by nationalist and Muslim critics.

The United States rarely acknowledges firing the missiles, which are mostly fired from drones believed launched from neighboring Afghanistan, but there is little doubt it is responsible.

Islamabad routinely protests the strikes in the northwest as a violation of the country's sovereignty, but most observers speculate it has an unwritten agreement allowing them to take place, noting it would be highly damaging to be seen as colluding with Washington in attacks on its people.

Washington is pressing Pakistan to crack down on militants in the border, which it blames for rising attacks on Western troops in Afghanistan as well as violence within Pakistan.

On Tuesday as Mr. Obama was sworn-in as U.S. president, one hardline Islamist welcomed Mr. Obama's words of outreach.

"We can also anticipate good hope provided Obama really takes a new course of action toward injustices the Muslim world is facing at this moment," said Qazi Hussain Ahmed, leader of the Jamaat-e-Islami, a major hard-line Islamist party.

Responding to Mr. Obama's message, Ahmed said the new president would have to reverse the "biased policies of Bush if he is really interested in seeking a new way forward with Muslim world." A new way forward, he said, can be based only on equality and justice.

Earlier Friday, a suicide attack and a roadside bomb killed two soldiers and three civilians in the Swat Valley, a one-time tourist destination close to the border region, officials said.

Pakistan has launched military offensives in parts of the northwest, but insurgents are making inroads Swat, blowing up schools, killing police and soldiers and calling for the imposition of a hardline interpretation of Islamic law.

Militancy in Swat is seen as especially dangerous for Pakistan because the valley lies away from the areas where al Qaeda and the Taliban have traditionally operated.

An indication of the difficulties facing the government, more than 1,000 hard-liners demonstrated in the capital, saying there would only be peace in Swat and other frontier regions if the government severs its ties with the United States.

"The lawlessness cannot end until the end of the pro-America policy," one speaker told the crowd gathered close to the Parliament building in Islamabad.


i think this is the right thing to do, just as i thought it was the right thing to do when bush was doing it. if we have actionable intel on aq operatives, take them out.

the real question is how the obama supporters who thought a promise of pulling out of iraq meant pulling out of the middle east all together will react to this.

#2 lordvader129

lordvader129

    He Who Posts Alot...

  • Head Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,735 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago, USA
  • Interests:#lordvader129
  • Xbox Version:v1.1
  • 360 version:v5.0 (360S - trinity)

Posted 24 January 2009 - 08:17 AM

obamas been pro-attack pakistan since before he declared his candidacy for president, its actually one of the reasons i voted for him, lol

#3 Tripme

Tripme

    X-S X-perience

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 454 posts
  • Xbox Version:unk
  • 360 version:v1 (xenon)

Posted 24 January 2009 - 05:40 PM

I am for Obama, but I never believed we would pull out of the middle east. I hate when people say that he is just going to stop the war and that will be the end of it..

#4 Reaper527

Reaper527

    X-S Knowledgebase

  • Head Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,499 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA
  • Xbox Version:v1.0
  • 360 version:v3.0 (falcon)

Posted 24 January 2009 - 10:52 PM

QUOTE(Tripme @ Jan 24 2009, 12:16 PM) View Post

I am for Obama, but I never believed we would pull out of the middle east. I hate when people say that he is just going to stop the war and that will be the end of it..



agreed, but there are alot of people who thought that though. it will be interesting to see what they say once the "closing guantanamo" distraction settles down.

i have to admit, that was very clever doing something like this at the same time he announced the closing of guantanamo. while closing that prison is a HUGE mistake, the majority of the public supports the idea, and it completely downplayed the strike.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users