Considering it's a
team SOTW, the votes should count as one per sig/team. If you were going to count votes per individual, you should have just made a regular SOTW. A team's effort went into making the sig. The votes should count for the sig not for the individual. On top of that, individual voting would be needlessly confusing for something like this.
For example, using individual voting:
Team 1:
Member A gets 5 votes.
Member B gets 2 votes.
Team 2:
Member A gets 0 votes.
Member B gets 5 votes.
Team 3:
Member A gets 5 votes.
Member B gets 5 votes.
That would be a four-way tie between T1MA, T2MB, T3MA and T3MB. Would these four individuals have to dissect the part of each sig that they worked on and get re-voted on, or will team votes
then be counted? The former is clearly ridiculous. The latter would net Team 3 an easy victory with 10 votes. With all that trouble, it would have just been easier to vote one per sig/team from the start.
Mild rant: The
of-the-week in the name is misleading. SOTW started early last August. We should be in the high 40s as far as contests go, but the last contest that was done was 22. Something is clearly amiss. For a while now, regular sig-of-the-week contests have been clocking in at about 2 to 2.5 weeks; this TSOTW could take even longer with the "registration" period, the submission, and the voting. You might have to change its name to
team-sig-of-the-three-weeks or even the dreaded
team-sig-of-the-month if there's a tie. There needs to be a new way to do things. As voting is going on for one contest, open another for submissions.
QUOTE(lostboyz @ Jul 10 2006, 10:01 PM)

i dont think its important to say what each person did, so far its pretty obvious, at least to me
It's not obvious to people that casually drop by the graphics section just to vote. 'Tis another example of how individual voting would be confusing.
This post has been edited by metaldevil: Jul 11 2006, 03:50 AM