QUOTE(MrPhunkee @ Jan 9 2006, 02:49 PM)
Me dont care. Then they shouldnt have sell this product with the label "backwards compatible"
ignorance is bliss isnt it?
QUOTE(MrPhunkee @ Jan 9 2006, 03:33 PM)
I sold that junk, cuz 360 should have been bc
by your reasoning of your posts, if it doesnt support every game then they shouldnt say its "backwards compatible"? well then the ps2 shouldnt be labelled BC either as every ps1 games doesnt work for the ps2. also if you think the ps3 will have any easier time with BC your nuts, if im not mistaken dont they have to emulate the ps1/2 games on the cell/nvidia technology? or are they doing with the ps3 as they did with the ps2 and including ps2 chips in the ps3 to make BC easy? if all this is true then i would worry because sony isnt a software company and would blow writing emu. software.
many people expected anywhere between 10-30 titles on launch to be BC and we got around 200, yet people who dont know any better still care to bitch.
you sold your xbox because you heard the 360 would be BC but you refuse to do research to learn about emulation and how the 360 would achieve its BC and yet even after all that ignorance on your part its easy for you to blame MS for things you know nothing of?? some people truely have some issues.
there is no telling how long it will take them to emu. the rest of the games and fix what bugs are in the original list, but atleast we know they are working on it. other then a choice few titles here and there they already have all my fav. xbox games on emu. so no complaints from me (not that i play them anyways.)