|
  |
Largest Hard Drive Still 137gb? |
|
|
| MaXa |
Aug 31 2003, 04:13 PM
|
X-S Enthusiast
Group: Members
Posts: 19
Joined: 28-August 03
Member No.: 59154

|
| QUOTE (AsTnBoMb @ Aug 31 2003, 06:01 PM) | | I dunno oz_paulb, I wouldnt underestimate the hard drive companies, they sure have come a long way very very fast. | But my money always takes longer
|
|
|
|
| |
| Flagg3 |
Aug 31 2003, 04:28 PM
|
X-S Expert
  
Group: Members
Posts: 598
Joined: 20-November 02
Member No.: 9492

|
| QUOTE (Schweino @ Aug 31 2003, 02:56 PM) | Get the 5400 rpm since it stays cooler. The xbox doesnt make any use of the 8 mb cache and the 7200 rpm at all, so it makes no sense getting the WD | Why do people still believe this? The xbox will ABSOLUTELY benefit from a faster hard drive with more cache!
Both of these features help increase access times. While it's true that you will still be limited by the ATA-33 transfer rate, that only affects maximum sustained throughput.
I believe this myth has perpetuated because of the fact that faster hard drives don't really offer much benefit for people who are upgrading PVRs.
So you will definitely see a very noticeable improvement in performance with a faster hard drive. As for the heat issue that really depends. In general, the xbox doesn't have any problems with overheating so this isn't that big of a concern. However I have seen some boxes which tend to run hotter than others. My boxes always average around 120 degrees farenheight cpu temp even with a 7200rpm drive. If your box runs around 140 degrees before upgrading the drive then you might want to opt for a cooler drive. Although I have seen boxes that run perfectly stable with a cpu temp of 160 degrees, the hotter your box runs the shorter it's lifespan will most likely be.
Flagg
|
|
|
|
| |
| NightL1fe |
Aug 31 2003, 04:33 PM
|

X-S Genius
   
Group: Members
Posts: 955
Joined: 4-May 03
Member No.: 36038

|
| QUOTE (Flagg3 @ Aug 31 2003, 01:28 PM) | | QUOTE (Schweino @ Aug 31 2003, 02:56 PM) | Get the 5400 rpm since it stays cooler. The xbox doesnt make any use of the 8 mb cache and the 7200 rpm at all, so it makes no sense getting the WD |
Why do people still believe this? The xbox will ABSOLUTELY benefit from a faster hard drive with more cache!
Both of these features help increase access times. While it's true that you will still be limited by the ATA-33 transfer rate, that only affects maximum sustained throughput.
I believe this myth has perpetuated because of the fact that faster hard drives don't really offer much benefit for people who are upgrading PVRs.
So you will definitely see a very noticeable improvement in performance with a faster hard drive. As for the heat issue that really depends. In general, the xbox doesn't have any problems with overheating so this isn't that big of a concern. However I have seen some boxes which tend to run hotter than others. My boxes always average around 120 degrees farenheight cpu temp even with a 7200rpm drive. If your box runs around 140 degrees before upgrading the drive then you might want to opt for a cooler drive. Although I have seen boxes that run perfectly stable with a cpu temp of 160 degrees, the hotter your box runs the shorter it's lifespan will most likely be.
Flagg | very true indeed.. i have noticed the 8mb caches access files and games a tad bit fast..correct me if i'm wrong but i thought the xbox will shut itself down after 140f-145f? how could you see a 160f xbox running stable ?
|
|
|
|
| |
| crumb |
Aug 31 2003, 04:54 PM
|
X-S Enthusiast
Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 28-August 03
Member No.: 59139

|
| QUOTE (AsTnBoMb @ Aug 31 2003, 06:01 PM) | | I dunno oz_paulb, I wouldnt underestimate the hard drive companies, they sure have come a long way very very fast. | The hard drive manufacturers won't have 2.2TB in 3.5" enclosures by 2005.
|
|
|
|
| |
| NightL1fe |
Aug 31 2003, 05:10 PM
|

X-S Genius
   
Group: Members
Posts: 955
Joined: 4-May 03
Member No.: 36038

|
| QUOTE (heinrich @ Aug 31 2003, 01:50 PM) | From my understanding the xbox shut down at 71C, or 159.8F.
I concur that a 7200rpm, 8mb chache drive means better seek times, and overall better performance. Especially on large, fragmented drives. | RIGHT! so how the hell is Flagg seeing xboxs running stable at 160F?
|
|
|
|
| |
| alphaman |
Aug 31 2003, 09:01 PM
|
X-S Enthusiast
Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 31-August 03
Member No.: 59637

|
Good work Paul!  I'd love to do Beta! I'm just kinda wondering how hard it would be to apply this fix when it's available?
|
|
|
|
| |
| oz_paulb |
Aug 31 2003, 09:18 PM
|
X-S X-perience
 
Group: Members
Posts: 345
Joined: 24-August 03
Member No.: 58282

|
| QUOTE (crumb @ Aug 31 2003, 05:57 PM) | | QUOTE (oz_paulb @ Aug 31 2003, 04:22 PM) | | Yes, 2.2TB is the theoretical max drive capacity (since we're only using 32bits of the possible 48bits of LBA48 addressing). |
Q: Is that a result of the BIOS accepting a long as a parameter in it's disk functions?
Could it possibly accept a structure that is 48-bits in total? That would allow drives up to 144,115 TB or 144 PB. |
Throughout the kernel, a 32bit sector number is used for low-level access.
To change it to use something larger would make it incompatible with existing apps.
If we start filling up 2.2TB drives, and it becomes a problem, I'll take another look at expanding it past 32bits.
- Paulb
|
|
|
|
| |
| XanTium |
Aug 31 2003, 09:56 PM
|

Xanta Powa!

Group: Admin
Posts: 3110
Joined: 17-May 02
From: Solaris
Member No.: 2
Xbox Version: v1.0
360 version: v1 (xenon)

|
| QUOTE (oz_paulb @ Aug 31 2003, 04:19 PM) | | QUOTE (oblox @ Aug 31 2003, 10:09 AM) | | Hell there's a though how about remapping all the Partitions in the bios!!!! A dual boot system ahoy? |
That's really a great idea - you could have multiple sets of Xbox system partitions (drive C:), and use a partition editor to choose which one should be 'active' for the next boot.
I haven't tried it, but there's no reason why the standard Xbox partitions can't be moved around/put > 137GB. The offsets/sizes were all hard-coded into the BIOS before - now they are just entries in the partition table. The only thing that is 'hard-coded' is the partition numbers - (example: the 2nd entry in the partition table ("partition2") is always the Xbox system drive (C:)). That 2nd entry can be changed to point to any place on the drive. As I said, I haven't tried this, but it should work.
- Paulb | I like that idea ...
Would make it possible to have a fully retail C/E drive to play on xbox live (so even if MS scans HD they won't detect anything (unless they go raw axx the drive ofcourse)). And if you boot your xbox with the hacked bios you get other C/E/F drives with edited stuff.
|
|
|
|
| |
| oz_paulb |
Aug 31 2003, 11:01 PM
|
X-S X-perience
 
Group: Members
Posts: 345
Joined: 24-August 03
Member No.: 58282

|
| QUOTE (XanTium @ Aug 31 2003, 11:56 PM) | | QUOTE (oz_paulb @ Aug 31 2003, 04:19 PM) | | QUOTE (oblox @ Aug 31 2003, 10:09 AM) | | Hell there's a though how about remapping all the Partitions in the bios!!!! A dual boot system ahoy? |
That's really a great idea - you could have multiple sets of Xbox system partitions (drive C:), and use a partition editor to choose which one should be 'active' for the next boot.
I haven't tried it, but there's no reason why the standard Xbox partitions can't be moved around/put > 137GB. The offsets/sizes were all hard-coded into the BIOS before - now they are just entries in the partition table. The only thing that is 'hard-coded' is the partition numbers - (example: the 2nd entry in the partition table ("partition2") is always the Xbox system drive (C:)). That 2nd entry can be changed to point to any place on the drive. As I said, I haven't tried this, but it should work.
- Paulb |
I like that idea ...
Would make it possible to have a fully retail C/E drive to play on xbox live (so even if MS scans HD they won't detect anything (unless they go raw axx the drive ofcourse)). And if you boot your xbox with the hacked bios you get other C/E/F drives with edited stuff. | It seems like this would be possible, but it depends on what live looks for.
If they do raw access to the drive ("\Device\Harddisk0\partition0"), then they can scan the entire drive, and all bets are off.
- Paulb
|
|
|
|
| |
|
  |
|