QUOTE(xzenor @ Nov 12 2006, 05:39 AM)
I shouldn't have to buy them, that thing is like $600!! It should come with an HDTV.
agreed. and although the following comment holds weight:
QUOTE(epsilon72 @ Nov 12 2006, 08:39 PM)
It would take a huge amount of money for Sony to provide them, but probably less than 10% of PS3 users will actually use them. If you plan on getting the system, just buy a $6.50 HDMI cable from monoprice.com.
it still does not explain why ive got component with my 360.
QUOTE(silentbob343 @ Nov 12 2006, 06:20 AM)
Again, all of this was covered in prior threads. You last comment tells me that you think the PS3 is over priced; which leads me to believe you have no plans of owning one, or at least any time soon, and that your sole purpose was to stir up controversy.
Sony has made a lot of stupid mistakes and most have been covered ad nauseum in this section.
haha, funny. i like controversy
, i think the ps3 is overpriced (in europe) but i do have plans to buy one....
sony needs to get their fucking act together - in fact so do MS (they are closer to 'good behaviour' in this regard) - they need to realise that whether its the US market or the EU one, a console sold is a console sold. yes, its a loss. but its market share. both firms need to stop being pussies and stop ripping off the EU. first one that does wins. seriously, $808 (official), and $1046 for a ps3 according to amazon and curries? get fucked! considering that the 360 has been $570 (premium) since launch with one game included you start to see that the US market might not be the battlefield. don't get me wrong, ill get a ps3 - in a year at this rate............
maybe ive got my maths wrong - im not good at it at the best of times, but am sampling a new beer called 'cheers' on ko san road - 5.7% my arse...........