Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 25-May 02
Member No.: 150
Been debating buying this one. I keep picking it up in the stores, but I put it down because I could just imagine the wife's reaction to buying another game. I just recently got my Xbox with 3 games.
Think I best wait a bit.
Any other complaints about the game other than the "graphics tweak"?
Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 1-June 02
Member No.: 365
i agree with the graphics. they could have been a little better.
however, theres no slow-downs during heavy fire fights, which is a huge bonus to someone like me who played allied assault to death and got really ragged off, when your fps hit 10 during a fire fight. omaha beach was unbarable at some stages.
Group: Members
Posts: 1216
Joined: 25-May 02
From: Microsoft Headquarters
Member No.: 138
MOH is deffinitely coming out for xbox... it was first supposed to be MOHAA but now they are releasing MOHFA instead. so if u can wait MOHFA will be much better on xbox i guarantee but i can't so i got it for ps2 first day
Group: Members
Posts: 140
Joined: 26-May 02
Member No.: 200
Wow I got it today expecting mediocre graphics, and it REALLY looks good. The textures are better on the PC, but character models and animations/deaths are better on the PS2. Play it on an HDTV with component cables, and you'll see what I'm talking about. Of course the controls are never going to be as responsive as the PC, but the missions are different so it's pretty cool.
Group: Members
Posts: 1216
Joined: 25-May 02
From: Microsoft Headquarters
Member No.: 138
i don't like the fact that u have to push L1 in order to aim. they should have crosshairs on all the time. u shouldn't have to stand still to aim... totally kills it
Group: Members
Posts: 219
Joined: 2-June 02
Member No.: 379
[B][COLOR=green]
Yes, I got to admit that the ps2 graphics are not that well structured. In fact, there aren't any games that I remember that have had me outstanding unbeliveable graphics like RE for GC or SM for XBOX.
Ps2 is the worst of all the 3 consoles in the graphics department, there is simply too much bluriness when an object is moving. I really hate this, it makes my eyes hurt
Group: Members
Posts: 219
Joined: 2-June 02
Member No.: 379
Yes, I got to admit that the ps2 graphics are not that well structured. In fact, there aren't any games that I remember that have had me outstanding unbeliveable graphics like RE for GC or SM for XBOX.
Ps2 is the worst of all the 3 consoles in the graphics department, there is simply too much bluriness when an object is moving. I really hate this, it makes my eyes hurt
Group: Members
Posts: 219
Joined: 2-June 02
Member No.: 379
Yes, I got to admit that the ps2 graphics are not that well structured. In fact, there aren't any games that I remember that have had me outstanding unbeliveable graphics like RE for GC or SM for XBOX.
Ps2 is the worst of all the 3 consoles in the graphics department, there is simply too much bluriness when an object is moving. I really hate this, it makes my eyes hurt
Group: Members
Posts: 140
Joined: 26-May 02
Member No.: 200
Hmmm if you mean that the Xbox textures are better I agree, but the poly count on the PS2 is good enough to compete with either of them. Actually it does more polys than the GC, but the gamecube games "look" better because of the amount of texture memory as well. Eventhough graphics are important, you have to have good games.