|
  |
Opened A Xbox To Find A Hitachi-lg Dvdrom, **MERGED TOPICS** |
|
|
| Tiros |
Mar 27 2005, 07:37 PM
|
X-S Member

Group: Members
Posts: 102
Joined: 24-October 02
Member No.: 5960

|
QUOTE(truBB @ Mar 27 2005, 08:29 AM) If ppl are interested, I can post a signal trace of the original thompson dvd drive I have tested. Specifically, you know the path from Ready signal throughout the original xdrive? I would like to take a look if it is possible. I still believe it may be possible to eliminate the chip. To save space, bend all IC legs flat, cut off points, solder to stubs. As someone said earlier, connect all unused CMOS inputs to GND or VCC. VCC should be pin 14, should be 3.3 volt as menlik said. In this circuit, the HC(t)14 is a MUCH better choice than the HC(t)04. Congrats on the results! This post has been edited by Tiros: Mar 27 2005, 07:47 PM
|
|
|
|
| |
| truBB |
Mar 28 2005, 12:14 AM
|

X-S Member

Group: Members
Posts: 103
Joined: 27-August 04
From: Long Beach / Lakewood, California
Member No.: 142162
Xbox Version: v1.6

|
QUOTE(Tiros @ Mar 27 2005, 09:43 AM) Specifically, you know the path from Ready signal throughout the original xdrive? I would like to take a look if it is possible. I still believe it may be possible to eliminate the chip. Yeah, you might be able to eliminate the chip. But looking at the images from my post #445, the resistors runing in series coming from pin 5,6&7 are 1k ohm (ie. R228), which I didn't find on the GDR-8163b at all. So when you find these points on the LG xdrive, you may still need these parts. I hope you can get one of these xdrive, as I'm curious as to where these connections go. menelik, I popped in a 74 HC14 & used a diode to drop the input voltage, and tested away. I found that I needed to increase the resistor-cap values to get it to work (270Kohm & 10uF worked great) . Then I went back to my 74 HCT14, tried different dvd-Rs, ritek G04, ritek G05, maxell, princo dvd-rw, verbatim cdrw, with this resistor-cap values. It worked very well with all the disks. I'm going to change my pictures to use this resistor-cap combo now. I believe its a more robust solution to the problem. I also tried some original game disks and could only get it to say " game" in eVox after the first eject. THis is really not a problem since you can still play the game apon boot-up & rip the dvd within dvd2xbox. My solution is really a hack to get this drive to work. We found it to be the simplest solution for the problem. Looking back at all the data read from my original thompson, it would require a uController or a more complex circuit to give the xbox the signals it wants. Basically, what I have works, but it is definitely not perfect.
|
|
|
|
| |
| LenteSubigo |
Mar 28 2005, 05:49 AM
|

X-S Member

Group: Members
Posts: 143
Joined: 29-November 04
From: Twin Cities, MN
Member No.: 171721
Xbox Version: v1.1

|
QUOTE(bourke @ Mar 27 2005, 06:15 PM) Do you think the Dangerous Brothers could patch the firmware to read at 16X rather than 4X? They seemed to have patched RPC1 on the 8163B last July; do you really think that it would be that difficult a change to unlock the drive speed? Is it likely to be just a couple of bytes/bits in the firmware that limits the drive speed? cheers, Bourkie First, it would be much harder to change the speed than to change the region locks. The reason is that the xbox firmware is encrypted, and regular dvd-rom firmware is not. Second, most firmware hackers, including the Dangerous Brothers don't want to get on M$'s bad side. They don't want to be sued. So,you would have to find a firmware hacker with encryption experience who is willing to put a few hundred man hours into hacking the firmware with no pay for their services, and the risk of being sued by M$.
|
|
|
|
| |
| bourke |
Mar 28 2005, 07:41 AM
|
X-S Senior Member
 
Group: XS-BANNED
Posts: 260
Joined: 9-December 03
Member No.: 80514
Xbox Version: unk
360 version: unknown

|
QUOTE(LenteSubigo @ Mar 28 2005, 04:55 AM) First, it would be much harder to change the speed than to change the region locks. The reason is that the xbox firmware is encrypted, and regular dvd-rom firmware is not. Second, most firmware hackers, including the Dangerous Brothers don't want to get on M$'s bad side. They don't want to be sued. So,you would have to find a firmware hacker with encryption experience who is willing to put a few hundred man hours into hacking the firmware with no pay for their services, and the risk of being sued by M$. Are we 100% sure it is encrypted? Is the binary completely difference to the one in the 8163B? If it is encrypted is has to be hardware encrypted (e.g. SHA1) does it not? I am sure the firmware encryption is slightly easier than the 2048-bit RSA key used for the games! I am willing to have a crack at decrypting it if anyone else cares to join in?! After all decryption for the purpose of inter-operability is perfectly legal here in Australia, and I believe that is also the case for the US - see Lexmark vs Static Control Components (SCC)! cheers, Bourkie This post has been edited by bourke: Mar 28 2005, 07:44 AM
|
|
|
|
| |
| wenid |
Mar 28 2005, 11:10 AM
|
X-S Member

Group: Members
Posts: 60
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 188893

|
Yes, I'm back for one last post. Yes, I made some mistakes -- I am human after all. Yes, Tiros, the mod can be done without an inverter or anything. Yes, menelik, I was wrong about the 5V (in my defense, a lot less was known about any of this then than is known now, so it was easier to get confused about exactly what was what). Feel free to point at me and laugh or whatever if it makes you feel better somehow, just don't expect me to give a crap. Personally, I only ever viewed my earlier work as prototypical, investigative probing. I don't know why it has been taken as if it was a finished (or even nearly finished) product. Sorry if I seemed to represent it as such. Now, however, I am finished. Here are the points. All but eject, which I'm assuming everyone agrees is fine as per the markings on the circuit board itself (most recently illustrated by truBB in post 489 and kind of incidentally by menelik in 491).  Recent experience has led me to believe that our naming of these signals is a bit misleading, but I'll stick with it for want of anything better, except that I can't remember which is which of the tray signals anymore (or at least not right now). Pin numbers are based on looking into the socket on an Xbox DVD drive and counting from left to right, top row then bottom row 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 From left to right in the pic, the points are "ready" (pink circle, pin 9), tray signal 1(in? out? who knows? pin 3 anyway, yellow circle), unconnected pin in SD-616T mod that I'll call "valid" (pin 10, blue circle), tray signal 2 (pin 4, red circle). On the 8050L, all these have a 1k resistor between the connector for the yellow wires cable and the controller chip. Those resistors aren't present on the 8163B (presumably because these signals aren't connected to the outside world in an unmodified 8163B). I installed my own 1k resistors by tacking one end of the resistor to each point and then connecting the signal wire to the other end of the resistor. I'm pretty sure it will work without them, but I wouldn't recommend leaving them out -- they must be there for good reason in the 8050L. Finally, here are the pins on the controller chip that each of these points is connected to ready/pink - pin 50 tray 1/yellow - pin 49 valid/blue - pin 52 tray 2/red - pin 65
|
|
|
|
| |
| bourke |
Mar 28 2005, 02:42 PM
|
X-S Senior Member
 
Group: XS-BANNED
Posts: 260
Joined: 9-December 03
Member No.: 80514
Xbox Version: unk
360 version: unknown

|
QUOTE(wenid @ Mar 28 2005, 10:16 AM) On the 8050L, all these have a 1k resistor between the connector for the yellow wires cable and the controller chip. Those resistors aren't present on the 8163B (presumably because these signals aren't connected to the outside world in an unmodified 8163B). I installed my own 1k resistors by tacking one end of the resistor to each point and then connecting the signal wire to the other end of the resistor. I'm pretty sure it will work without them, but I wouldn't recommend leaving them out -- they must be there for good reason in the 8050L.
All perfect, however one last question: On the 8050L, does the eject signal also have a 1k0 resistor between the connector and the point on the board? cheers, Bourkie
|
|
|
|
| |
| Tiros |
Mar 28 2005, 06:44 PM
|
X-S Member

Group: Members
Posts: 102
Joined: 24-October 02
Member No.: 5960

|
Now that's what I'm talkin about!  Great work, wenid! Those 1k resistors are there to protect against the (possible) voltage mismatch between the 3.3 drive supply and the 3.3 xbox logic supply. As long as the supplies are within .6 volts of each other (and they really oughta or something is wrong), they will not forward bias protection diodes on xbox main board and are unnecessary. They can't hurt though. Menlik, I was suggesting the HC(t)14 would be better due to the long rise time on the "created" ready signal. Since the true signal is now found it doesn't matter. This post has been edited by Tiros: Mar 28 2005, 06:44 PM
|
|
|
|
| |
|
  |
|