You think we should be accountable, but the first time i throw it back, you run and hide. I understand.
Aren't you the one defending the american actions in the war? If you said USA made a really bad decision going to war with Iraq, do you really think we'd have this conversation now? No, but since you're defending the american actions my questions are VALID. There are intelligent americans(even conservatives) who think the war is stupid, and guess what, I agree with them. Are you compelled to defend america because you live there? Stop doing that and the world might make a little sense to you. Did you really think I would discuss with you if you were an american against the war?
I never ran and hide because I would need to defend my country. But I got pissed off since YOU think I must defend my own country. I'm not accountable for my country's actions as I don't defend dumb decisions my country make, but since you DO defend USA it's very valid to question you. But since my government is social democratic which resembles to my ideology I often do defend them, but defending for no other reason than it's your own country is for the birds.
I can pull up links all day to disproove you, can you?
Yes I can.
Taken from Blix himself: "The important thing to remember, Blix said repeatedly, was that Saddam was cooperating with the inspections, despite the difficulties they create for a leader. "No one likes inspectors, not tax inspectors, not health inspectors, not any inspectors," Blix chuckled. Not only did Saddam have to endure the indignity of submitting to searches of his palaces, he explained, but the dictator also harbored the valid fear that the inspectors would pass on their findings of conventional weapons to foreign intelligence agencies, providing easy future targets."link to the text
.Debate with O'Reilly
<-- This cracked me up. O'Reilly really tries to push him into saying his crazy stuff.
Well it could try to stop terrorism but wait it's just some small ass little isolationist country that doesnt have to worry about its ties to keep the economy and way of life going. Truth is you couldnt do shit but we can so we did.
Hmm. Well I don't know where you've been during the debates, but one of the REASON we were against the war was because we don't BELIEVE in your way of fighting terrorism. You can't end terrorism by using terrorism. Everyone knows that you're feeding terrorism right now, and in the end thousands of people have died and the situation is far worse. If anyone in my country knew a secret button to end all terrorism, it would've been pressed allready. With your sig and avatar it's obvious you think violence is the best option(or only option). But since we're not that guncrazy in this part of the world we see violence as a VERY last resort. Bush instead was EAGER to use violence instead of diplomacy.This post has been edited by gronne: Jan 22 2005, 11:27 AM