xbox-scene.com - your xbox news information source
Quick Links: Main Forums | Xbox360 Forums | Xbox1 Forums | PS3 Forums
Xbox-Scene Forum Help  Search Xbox-Scene Forums   Xbox-Scene Forum Members   Xbox-Scene Calendar

Giganews Usenet Offers: +1150 days binary retention, 99%+ Completion, and Unlimited Speed/Access!

360 ODD Emulators: X360 Key $99 | Wasabi360 FAT $99 | Wasabi360 Slim $99
C4E's iXtreme Burner MAX Drive: LiteOn iHAS124 DROPPED TO JUST $17


Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules Rules
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> T-rex Soft Tissue Found, Check this out!
EntertainEX
post Oct 5 2006, 03:50 PM
Post #1


X-S Enthusiast


Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 26-September 06
From: Lewisville, TX
Member No.: 302206
Xbox Version: v1.6b
360 version: v1 (xenon)



T-Rex Soft Tissue Found in Montana

Read this, it'll make you start to think...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EntertainEX
post Oct 5 2006, 04:17 PM
Post #2


X-S Enthusiast


Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 26-September 06
From: Lewisville, TX
Member No.: 302206
Xbox Version: v1.6b
360 version: v1 (xenon)



Scientist quote that stuff is this old say 70 million years old then evolutionists say DNA can't live for more than 10,000 years... How the hell do they know? It's nothing more than a theory and this discovery just could possibly break this theory... I believe if you preserve something just right and stay the same temperature it can live for however long... The soft tissue was in the middle of a bone that they broke in half. So that means it had a shell around that tissue and was deep in the ground obviously and would have stayed revelantly the same temperature. So what do you think?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
throwingks
post Oct 5 2006, 05:49 PM
Post #3


X-S Freak
*****

Group: Head Moderator
Posts: 1957
Joined: 3-October 03
Member No.: 65884
Xbox Version: v1.4
360 version: v4.0 (jasper)



I think that is awesome. Maybe a Jurrasic Park in the future?

I am not sure because it has been a long time since I looked at this stuff. But, I think human DNA can only be traced back 10,000 years. Not a physical limitation of the life span of DNA but, the fact that none can be traced back to be older than that. I would assume that under the right conditions DNA can remain detectable and therefor reproducible forever. That is at least how I remember it. If their was a 10,000 year limitation then the Asian scientists looking for mammoth DNA would be wasting their time.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
epsilon72
post Oct 5 2006, 06:29 PM
Post #4


X-S Freak
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1213
Joined: 6-March 06
From: Arizona
Member No.: 274704
Xbox Version: v1.6
360 version: none



Awesome. I want a pet T-Rex, like Calvin in Calvin & Hobbes.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
awal
post Oct 6 2006, 08:24 PM
Post #5


X-S Freak
*****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 1255
Joined: 20-July 04
From: ████████████
Member No.: 131919
Xbox Version: v1.0
360 version: none



I read the title and expected something about kleenex (tissue)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EntertainEX
post Oct 7 2006, 12:56 AM
Post #6


X-S Enthusiast


Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 26-September 06
From: Lewisville, TX
Member No.: 302206
Xbox Version: v1.6b
360 version: v1 (xenon)



lol that actually made me a laugh... good one...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
_GhOsT_
post Oct 7 2006, 07:11 AM
Post #7


X-S Genius
****

Group: Members
Posts: 970
Joined: 14-June 05
From: •°•°•°•°•°•°•°•°•
Member No.: 227302
Xbox Version: v1.6
360 version: v4.0 (jasper)



i think its cool that they found it

but i think its dumb how scientists age stuff

they use circular reasoning to age fossils

age the fossil by the layer
age the layer by the fossil
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EntertainEX
post Oct 7 2006, 03:15 PM
Post #8


X-S Enthusiast


Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 26-September 06
From: Lewisville, TX
Member No.: 302206
Xbox Version: v1.6b
360 version: v1 (xenon)



I agree with you ghost. I found this topic in another forum and decided to post it here as well and I mentioned the same thing in there about how they can age certain things. It makes no sense whatsoever and it's only a theory since they really can't prove their statement 100%.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lordvader129
post Oct 7 2006, 03:34 PM
Post #9


He Who Posts Alot...
***************

Group: Head Moderator
Posts: 17733
Joined: 6-May 03
From: Chicago, USA
Member No.: 36345
Xbox Version: v1.1
360 version: v5.0 (360S - trinity)



QUOTE(_GhOsT_ @ Oct 7 2006, 02:18 AM) *

i think its cool that they found it

but i think its dumb how scientists age stuff

they use circular reasoning to age fossils

age the fossil by the layer
age the layer by the fossil

sometimes layers are dated by fossils, sometimes fossils are dated by layer, but never at the same time, or on the same site, so its not actually circular, just another strawman used by young-earth creationists
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post





Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 07:52 PM