xbox-scene.com - your xbox news information source
Quick Links: Main Forums | Xbox360 Forums | Xbox1 Forums | PS3 Forums
Xbox-Scene Forum Help  Search Xbox-Scene Forums   Xbox-Scene Forum Members   Xbox-Scene Calendar

Giganews Usenet Offers: +1150 days binary retention, 99%+ Completion, and Unlimited Speed/Access!

360 ODD Emulators: X360 Key $99 | Wasabi360 FAT $99 | Wasabi360 Slim $99
C4E's iXtreme Burner MAX Drive: LiteOn iHAS124 DROPPED TO JUST $17


Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules Rules
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Cod2 To Cod3 Comparison, Your Thoughts
CattyKid
post Jan 26 2007, 05:21 AM
Post #1


X-S Messiah
*******

Group: Head Moderator
Posts: 3617
Joined: 16-January 05
From: The Great Continental 48
Member No.: 188467
Xbox Version: v1.0
360 version: v1 (xenon)



So, what are your thoughts on this? I think the single player is far superior but multiplayer is severely lacking.
CoD2 multiplayer was great because it was simple. A few weapons, one class, that's it. It was great on teams and it was great on solo. But, with the changes they have made I think they have complicated online too much. It seems like an Enemy Territory to me. Classes and upgraded abilities? Artillery strikes? Seems like such... a copy, do you know what I mean? I've seen that before in so many games, why not stick to the multiplayer everyone LOVED (well, after the patch came out to fix the lag...)?
I think I see myself playing more CoD2 than CoD3 online. What do you guys think and why?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
OFD
post Feb 1 2007, 02:50 AM
Post #2


X-S Young Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 51
Joined: 27-September 06
Member No.: 302263
Xbox Version: none
360 version: v1 (xenon)



Unfortunately I'm going to disagree with you!!

Although I didn't play as much MP on 2 as 3... and I DO agree that 2's MP is simpler (as a positive aspect!)... I think the MP on 3 is more complete, with a notable exception of the discrepancies between Allied and Axis weapon effectiveness. As well, the Maps are far better in 3, larger, better detail and design IMHO.

I still think 2 is a great game to play MP, but I prefer 3.

---end transmission---!!! wink.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
leo5111
post Feb 1 2007, 03:11 AM
Post #3


X-S Senior Member
**

Group: XS-BANNED
Posts: 214
Joined: 3-November 03
From: van nuys ca
Member No.: 71863
Xbox Version: v1.0
360 version: v1 (xenon)



i like the single player but as far as multiplayer... cod2 = http://www.thegoldpage.com/golden_facts/im...arious_gold.jpg cod3 = http://home.jspenguin.org:81/imgs/dog_crap.jpg tongue.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
OFD
post Feb 1 2007, 03:56 AM
Post #4


X-S Young Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 51
Joined: 27-September 06
Member No.: 302263
Xbox Version: none
360 version: v1 (xenon)



^ ROFL
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
2poor
post Feb 1 2007, 03:39 PM
Post #5


X-S Enthusiast


Group: Members
Posts: 26
Joined: 7-December 06
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Member No.: 316434
Xbox Version: v1.0
360 version: v3.0 (falcon)



COD2 was fun, yes, but I personally like COD3 much better. I think it helps that I played COD2: Big Red One online on my Xbox, and COD3 is similar to that.

I think the maps are far superior (especially the 6 new ones), and I like the fact that strategy is really a key element in winning. COD3 is all about flanking and I'm good at flanking. biggrin.gif

In short, thanks for COD2, but COD3 is here to stay! Did anyone really just want a carbon copy of COD2 with different maps? I sure didn't.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post





Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 12:52 PM