QUOTE(kowrip @ Sep 11 2007, 11:45 AM)

I've seen a few DVDs on an upconverting DVD player and while I think it looked better than when it was played on a regular player, it still did not compare to a true HD signal. I don't see how anybody can think that they are nearly equivalent. Did you ever upscale digital pictures ? They don't look very good at all. Basically, the algorithms are "guessing" at missing data and filling it in. There's simply no comparison to starting with the higher resolution in the first place.
*EDIT: I think cooljerk_dv summed it up nicely
I know how upscaling works but let's get practical and consider screen size and viewing distance. What I said, that how close an upscaled DVD looks in comparison to HD depends on screen size is FACT. Go to avsforum and see what they say. It's common sense.
Go look at a resolution chart that maps when viewers benefit from 480p, 720p, and so on as a function of viewing distance and screen size. If you're sitting at least 5 feet from the screen (which is, let's say 26 in), you probably can't see the difference between a good upscaled DVD player and an HD player. If you stand a foot from the screen, you may see a difference but what jackass sits that close to their screen?
Again, I said that you will notice a much better picture once you have a larger screen size, but not with smaller screens like the 26 inchers. You can't just compare upscaled DVD pictures and true HD without taking into account your viewing environment, can you?
This post has been edited by biga55: Sep 13 2007, 05:28 PM