xbox-scene.com - your xbox news information source
Quick Links: Main Forums | Xbox360 Forums | Xbox1 Forums | PS3 Forums
Xbox-Scene Forum Help  Search Xbox-Scene Forums   Xbox-Scene Forum Members   Xbox-Scene Calendar

Special Limited Offer: SuperNews Unlimited Usenet Access, Unlimited Speed for $11.99
256-bit SSL, 350 Days Retention, 30 Connections - Join Today! - ONLY $11.99

Support this site - buy the X-Scene Tshirt $17.95

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules Rules
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> SquareTrade Report Claims Xbox 360 Failure Rates at 16pct
Xbox-Scene
post Feb 14 2008, 06:55 AM
Post #1


Memba Numero Uno
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4177
Joined: 17-May 02
From: Yurop
Member No.: 1
Xbox Version: unk
360 version: unknown



SquareTrade Report Claims Xbox 360 Failure Rates at 16pct
Posted by XanTium | February 14 00:55 EST | News Category: Xbox360
 
From 1up.com:
[QUOTE]
A new report claims the truth is somewhere in the middle. SquareTrade deals in selling warranties for electronics, and has amassed their over 1000 warranty claims to come up with some interesting data. The findings were a 16.4% failure rate of Xbox 360 systems, versus a roughly 3% rate for the Sony PlayStation 3 or the Nintendo Wii with sample sizes in the high hundreds. The well-known "Red Ring of Death" error accounted for about 60% of those hardware failures, and thus most system-breaking problems are covered by Microsoft's extended warranty plan.

SquareTrade CEO Steve Abernethy speculated that the future may see an even higher percentage. "It is reasonable to believe these failure rates will increase over time, since the Xbox 360 failure issues tend to increase with prolonged use where overheating appears the main culprit," he said. Abernethy went on to note that while the company didn't track the different variations of the 360, he "would estimate most if not all were the original motherboard."
[/QUOTE]

Full Story: 1up.com




User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
g8crapachino
post Feb 14 2008, 08:08 AM
Post #2


X-S Senior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 268
Joined: 10-September 02
Member No.: 3656



The old motherboards are no longer being manufactured and they are being replaced/fixed as necessary. In all logic the number of failures would go down, not up.

I know it's human nature to be negative, cynical, and hope for the worst but the facts just don't fit the story. The story sides on the dramatic just to get readers.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bubbalynch
post Feb 14 2008, 09:02 AM
Post #3


X-S X-perience
**

Group: Members
Posts: 376
Joined: 29-September 05
From: United States
Member No.: 248915
Xbox Version: v1.5
360 version: v2 (zephyr)





QUOTE(g8crapachino @ Feb 14 2008, 08:44 AM) *

The old motherboards are no longer being manufactured and they are being replaced/fixed


Replaced by what? Another 'old' motherboard? (possibly)

Fixed how? You mean to tell me that theres actually a PERMINANT solution for console thats been plauged with the ROD? I think not.

If the board is replaced with a newer board thats been redisgned, maybe. If its only been 'fixed' or replaced with another old board, then it still falls in the faulty hardware catagory if ya ask me.

Until the old boards are completey squashed, which is nearly impossible considering how many are out there and how many are being used as refurbished products, the ROD will NEVER stop haunting 360 owners.

Thats my take on it anyways.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
openxdkman
post Feb 14 2008, 10:17 AM
Post #4


X-S Genius
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 753
Joined: 2-August 06
Member No.: 292548
Xbox Version: unk
360 version: unknown



The right way would be to measure stats for each model, for each manufacturing year, for a precise amount of time T.

Then if your 360 age is n*T, and RROD probability during amount of time T is p
(for a fixed number of played hours per week, in average climate)

Then, the global probability of RROD will be something like this formula :
(this is for very low p and n=300, but you get the idea)

IPB Image


So if 33% was for 1 year and 16% was for 6 months it's coherent but they never communicate the amount of time (age) of all measured xbox'es... So it's not enough precise to allow exact stat to be known. It's 2 figures anyway, for 1 year old, I guess : MS, you are bad console hardware designer.
That's all.

This post has been edited by openxdkman: Feb 14 2008, 10:24 AM
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
steveju
post Feb 14 2008, 11:24 AM
Post #5


X-S Senior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 189
Joined: 13-November 06
Member No.: 311057
Xbox Version: v1.6
360 version: v3.0 (falcon)



"In taking statistics, the two most important factors are sample size and randomness. By using a pool of over 1000 redeemed warranties, the report's sample size is sufficient."

Ermm... no, it's not. You can't just say that your sample size is sufficient, you need to present some proof. 1000 360s isn't even 0.01% of all the Xbox 360s ever sold. How did they come up with their numbers? How random was their testing?

Smells too much like BS. dry.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MaulerX
post Feb 14 2008, 03:54 PM
Post #6


X-S Senior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 221
Joined: 28-February 05
Member No.: 202469



QUOTE(Bubbalynch @ Feb 14 2008, 03:38 AM) *

Replaced by what? Another 'old' motherboard? (possibly)

Fixed how? You mean to tell me that theres actually a PERMINANT solution for console thats been plauged with the ROD? I think not.

If the board is replaced with a newer board thats been redisgned, maybe. If its only been 'fixed' or replaced with another old board, then it still falls in the faulty hardware catagory if ya ask me.

Until the old boards are completey squashed, which is nearly impossible considering how many are out there and how many are being used as refurbished products, the ROD will NEVER stop haunting 360 owners.

Thats my take on it anyways.


Did you read his post?? All he is saying is that with more reliable hardware already out there, that
16% overall failure rate should not go up, like the article suggests. In fact, it should slowly go down
as the overall install base grows with the better hardware.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
0794
post Feb 14 2008, 10:49 PM
Post #7


X-S Freak
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1095
Joined: 29-August 04
Member No.: 142820
Xbox Version: v1.4
360 version: v1 (xenon)



yet another attempt to try and statistically quantify the obviously reported problem with the 360's failure rate. and yet another failure to clearly present data that is believable by technical analysis standards although the actual reported failure rate sounds better or more realistic that either MS' or others' reports. until MS comes clean with the truth (and there is no need for them ever to) we can only continue pure speculation with random sample sets...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
NineT9mustang
post Feb 15 2008, 12:01 AM
Post #8


X-S Expert
***

Group: Members
Posts: 726
Joined: 5-August 04
From: Planet Krypton
Member No.: 136112
Xbox Version: v1.6
360 version: none



16%? I'd say more around 30-40%

Speaking from experience, I know of about 10 people with 360's, every single one of them has had their 360 go bad. Some once, most 2 or 3 times, one buddy had his go bad 6 times...

On top of this, they all know a bunch of people who had bad 360's...people i know that dont' own 360's know people who had their 360 go bad...

Sure this is just my side and I don't account for the entire 360 population, but i know plenty of people online who are in my same shoes...know tons of people who have had problems

Of course theres people who have had 0 problems, but we all know they are the minority

30-40% seems reasonable, call me crazy
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post





Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 09:01 AM