xbox-scene.com - your xbox news information source
Quick Links: Main Forums | Xbox360 Forums | Xbox1 Forums | PS3 Forums
Xbox-Scene Forum Help  Search Xbox-Scene Forums   Xbox-Scene Forum Members   Xbox-Scene Calendar

Special Limited Offer: SuperNews Unlimited Usenet Access, Unlimited Speed for $11.99
256-bit SSL, 350 Days Retention, 30 Connections - Join Today! - ONLY $11.99

Support this site - buy the X-Scene Tshirt $17.95

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Forum Rules Rules
2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Yahoo and AOL suddenly close to merging?
Xbox-Scene
post Apr 10 2008, 05:16 AM
Post #1


Memba Numero Uno
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4177
Joined: 17-May 02
From: Yurop
Member No.: 1
Xbox Version: unk
360 version: unknown



Yahoo and AOL suddenly close to merging?
Posted by XanTium | April 10 00:16 EST | News Category: Xbox360
 
From engadget.com:
[QUOTE]
Yahoo's done its best to fend off Microsoft's aggressive advances until now, but it suddenly looks like the struggling company might be getting some help -- both the Wall Street Journal and Reuters are reporting that the Yahoo is "closing in" on a deal to merge with Time Warner's AOL division and partner up with Google on search advertising.
The idea is for Time Warner to sell AOL to Yahoo and make a large investment in the new company, which would probably be valued at around $10B.
[/QUOTE]

Full Story: engadget.com | wsj.com | reuters.com




User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nagmine
post Apr 10 2008, 06:00 AM
Post #2


burp!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1442
Joined: 14-September 03
Member No.: 62475
Xbox Version: v1.1
360 version: v1 (xenon)



ah.. would have been a better idea to go with MS.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
metalcoat
post Apr 10 2008, 06:04 AM
Post #3


X-S Senior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 208
Joined: 16-July 03
From: Upstate New York
Member No.: 50329
Xbox Version: v1.0
360 version: v3.0 (falcon)



This will not pass regulatory commissions. Although I like Google and all, one company controlling 90% of advertising on the internet simply won't be good.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Elemino
post Apr 10 2008, 07:01 AM
Post #4


X-S Expert
***

Group: Members
Posts: 547
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Garland, TX
Member No.: 172367
Xbox Version: v1.0
360 version: v1 (xenon)





I don't get it. Are they saying to keep microsoft from buying yahoo they will sell theirselves to another company? That's a bit much to play hard to get isn't it?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Maverick-DBZ-
post Apr 10 2008, 07:57 AM
Post #5


X-S Senior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 180
Joined: 7-June 03
From: USA, California
Member No.: 42591
Xbox Version: v1.0
360 version: v2 (zephyr)



QUOTE(Elemino @ Apr 9 2008, 11:37 PM) *

I don't get it. Are they saying to keep microsoft from buying yahoo they will sell theirselves to another company? That's a bit much to play hard to get isn't it?



If by "theirselves" you mean AOL, then yes, if not I have no clue what you just read....


Time Warner owns AOL.

Time Warner sells AOL to Yahoo.

= Makes Yahoo a much bigger company and too "rich" for Microsoft to buy.


Then Timer Warner buys a nice percentage of Yahoo, thus sealing off MS from owning any large percentage of Yahoo.

It's a clever idea, but I don't think it's going to work, but if it does.... ph34r.gif


As far as the Yahoo/Google partnership, it looks like its just has to do with advertising and nothing more so don't go crazy people!!! wink.gif

This post has been edited by Maverick-DBZ-: Apr 10 2008, 08:00 AM
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
trey85stang
post Apr 10 2008, 08:41 AM
Post #6


X-S Expert
***

Group: Members
Posts: 576
Joined: 24-July 04
Member No.: 132961
Xbox Version: v1.0
360 version: unknown





QUOTE(nagmine @ Apr 10 2008, 06:36 AM) *

ah.. would have been a better idea to go with MS.


not really.

QUOTE(metalcoat @ Apr 10 2008, 06:40 AM) *

This will not pass regulatory commissions. Although I like Google and all, one company controlling 90% of advertising on the internet simply won't be good.


I think it will be fine, there doesnt appear to be any trade issues to me. If it does occur it will basically kick microsoft off the web all-together which is a good thing.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
b0ris84
post Apr 10 2008, 09:22 AM
Post #7


X-S Enthusiast


Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 28-August 04
Member No.: 142316



I don't have nothing against microsoft but what they are doing to yahoo is wrong. If someone doesn't want to be bought out than stop trying. Microsoft is doing anything they can to acquire yahoo. They have so much money and power that they will use stocks to acquire it. I'm glad yahoo is fighting back and not allowing ms to buy them out. MS is getting more and more greedy I think their rich and powerful enough. They released a crappy OS and are forcing it upon everyone and most people cannot do anything about it. They are not a monopoly but they have a lot of power in the computer world.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
scuba156
post Apr 10 2008, 09:42 AM
Post #8


X-S Hacker
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2891
Joined: 29-December 06
From: Australia
Member No.: 320922
Xbox Version: v1.4
360 version: v2 (zephyr)





QUOTE(b0ris84 @ Apr 10 2008, 06:58 PM) *

I don't have nothing against microsoft but what they are doing to yahoo is wrong. If someone doesn't want to be bought out than stop trying. Microsoft is doing anything they can to acquire yahoo. They have so much money and power that they will use stocks to acquire it. I'm glad yahoo is fighting back and not allowing ms to buy them out. MS is getting more and more greedy I think their rich and powerful enough. They released a crappy OS and are forcing it upon everyone and most people cannot do anything about it. They are not a monopoly but they have a lot of power in the computer world.

how are they forcing vista on everybody, if they will be releasing a new OS next year to overtake vista?

i dont think this will work for yahoo or time warner. this company is steadily dropping and i dont think anything can help it
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
luther349
post Apr 10 2008, 12:35 PM
Post #9


X-S Hacker
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2283
Joined: 7-January 03
From: irvine ky
Member No.: 16957
Xbox Version: v1.0
360 version: v1 (xenon)





oh i dunno vista only drivers on some hardware aka trying to drop xp like a bad habbit in under a year. not giving xp dx10 after they relised vista was a huge failer. games for vista only. of course all this was hacked around but its still the attempt that matters.

but forcing no they cant make you buy anything and if you hate windows that bad install linux.

but to get on topic m$ doesent need yahoo hell i didn't even know yahoo was in trouble. its just a sad attempt by m$ to try and take over the search market. but giving yahoo aol hell aol itself is a dieing brand at least as a isp unless there planing on making aol dsl yahoo does have yahoo att dsl. or something but even then most people have learned other then aim everything abought aol sucks.

This post has been edited by luther349: Apr 10 2008, 12:39 PM
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
scuba156
post Apr 10 2008, 01:31 PM
Post #10


X-S Hacker
******

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2891
Joined: 29-December 06
From: Australia
Member No.: 320922
Xbox Version: v1.4
360 version: v2 (zephyr)





QUOTE(luther349 @ Apr 10 2008, 10:11 PM) *

oh i dunno vista only drivers on some hardware aka trying to drop xp like a bad habbit in under a year. not giving xp dx10 after they relised vista was a huge failer. games for vista only. of course all this was hacked around but its still the attempt that matters.


vista only drivers were due to bugs already present in vistas drivers. the bug fixes had nothing to do with XP, so there was no need to release them. and thats not up to MS anyway, thats up to the hardware companies.

DX10 is not available for XP due to the WDDM technology in Vista, it has nothing to do with MS decided not to release DX10 for XP, its due to the OS's changes in the graphics API and driver mode. there is 'fallingleafsystems' way around this but not actually take advantage of direct3D 10 and is incompatible with just about everything.

games for vista was a marketing strategy and was the only thing pushing user to buy vista (only if they really cared about playing those games anyway), but was used only for MS studio games. many of the games require DX10, and use Live for Windows which is not available for XP (due to it being bulit into the OS)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Elemino
post Apr 10 2008, 04:02 PM
Post #11


X-S Expert
***

Group: Members
Posts: 547
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Garland, TX
Member No.: 172367
Xbox Version: v1.0
360 version: v1 (xenon)





QUOTE(b0ris84 @ Apr 10 2008, 02:58 AM) *

I don't have nothing against microsoft but what they are doing to yahoo is wrong. If someone doesn't want to be bought out than stop trying.
It's not wrong. If yahoo didn't want people trying to buy the company they should have never gone public in the first place. As soon as you offer stocks you're saying "come buy pieces of our company." That's exactly what MS is doing; it's just a much larger share than yahoo wanted anyone to buy.


QUOTE(Maverick-DBZ- @ Apr 10 2008, 01:33 AM) *

If by "theirselves" you mean AOL, then yes, if not I have no clue what you just read....
Time Warner owns AOL.

Time Warner sells AOL to Yahoo.

= Makes Yahoo a much bigger company and too "rich" for Microsoft to buy.
Then Timer Warner buys a nice percentage of Yahoo, thus sealing off MS from owning any large percentage of Yahoo.

It's a clever idea, but I don't think it's going to work, but if it does.... ph34r.gif
As far as the Yahoo/Google partnership, it looks like its just has to do with advertising and nothing more so don't go crazy people!!! wink.gif
Thanks... you did clear it up cuz I didn't get any of that. LOL

But I don't think it will make the companies value too much for MS, but I guess that's what they said in the article.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
loki232323
post Apr 10 2008, 07:06 PM
Post #12


X-S Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 85
Joined: 30-March 07
Member No.: 336300



QUOTE(Elemino @ Apr 10 2008, 11:38 AM) *

It's not wrong. If yahoo didn't want people trying to buy the company they should have never gone public in the first place. As soon as you offer stocks you're saying "come buy pieces of our company." That's exactly what MS is doing; it's just a much larger share than yahoo wanted anyone to buy.


Yeah but MS is pretty much trying to strong arm them on this one. Giving a deadline and saying that if you don't accept the offer we'll do this or that...

Ms has no reason to buy yahooo except that they are greedy and don't like seeing other companies dominatiing the way they do. MS should focus their attention on fixing all of the issues with their current divisions/offerings.

I mean who wants to see MS come in a F up the search market? I know I don't....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
irnchriz
post Apr 10 2008, 07:57 PM
Post #13


X-S Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 13-December 06
Member No.: 317578
Xbox Version: none
360 version: v4.0 (jasper)



Surely its down to the Yahoo shareholders if Microsoft gets to buy them or not?? Microsoft were annoyed that the Yahoo board did not even give the investors a say in whether they were willing to sell to Microsoft.

I would laugh my ass off if Yahoo joined with AOL and were valued at around 10bn and then Microsoft bought them both anyway......


Wait a minute, maybe thats part of the plan. Maybe Time Warner want to dunp that big ol white Elephant that is AOL and they reckon that if Microsoft are desperate to get Yahoo they can move AOL at the same time smile.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
0794
post Apr 10 2008, 09:25 PM
Post #14


X-S Freak
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1095
Joined: 29-August 04
Member No.: 142820
Xbox Version: v1.4
360 version: v1 (xenon)



QUOTE(irnchriz @ Apr 10 2008, 02:33 PM) *

I would laugh my ass off if Yahoo joined with AOL and were valued at around 10bn and then Microsoft bought them both anyway......
Wait a minute, maybe thats part of the plan. Maybe Time Warner want to dunp that big ol white Elephant that is AOL and they reckon that if Microsoft are desperate to get Yahoo they can move AOL at the same time smile.gif


i was thinking the same about some way to get rid of AOL - seems like they need a serious re-branding like HP did to Compaq...

Yahoo would be better off affiliated with MS rather than Time Warner/AOL...oh well, we will see what happens...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TMownsu
post Apr 11 2008, 01:07 AM
Post #15


X-S Enthusiast


Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: 13-November 07
From: Fremont California
Member No.: 362523
Xbox Version: v1.6b
360 version: v3.0 (falcon)





Wow two sinking ships joining to be one. Way to value your shareholders yahoo.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post





2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 08:10 AM