Celtics Versus Lakers, Should be a classic playoff |
|
|
| hardcandy |
Jun 2 2008, 09:39 PM
|
X-S X-perience
 
Group: XS-BANNED
Posts: 449
Joined: 25-July 05
Member No.: 236770
Xbox Version: unk
360 version: unknown

|
This will be the first time in many years I am looking forward to a NBA Championship series. Most years, I had no real emotional connection but now there is one. QUOTE LOS ANGELES VS. BOSTON No two teams have squared off on as many occasions in the NBA Finals as the Lakers and Celtics. They have faced each other 10 times, the first coming back in 1958-59 when Boston knocked off the Minneapolis Lakers in four straight. The Celtics won the next six series - all taking place in the 1960s. The final three matchups occurred in the '80s, with Los Angeles pulling out a pair of championships during the Magic Johnson-Larry Bird era. Incidentally, the last battle between these two teams, won by the Lakers in 1987, produced the highest TV ratings ever for an NBA Finals not including Michael Jordan. Most experts feel Los Angeles has the edge, especially with the 2-3-2 format, in the championship round. The Lakers were the only team in the West to win four road games this postseason, and since they failed to lose a contest at home, all they would have to do to win this series in five is to split the first pair in Boston. After being favored to take the title for much of the year, Boston now finds itself as the underdog heading into the championship round. The Celtics, who were the even money favorites to win the whole enchilada at the All-Star break, had jumped up to 3-2 at the end of the regular season. Their odds have risen once again to 8-5 against Los Angeles. Sports Network
|
|
|
|
| |
| Reaper527 |
Jun 9 2008, 03:57 PM
|

X-S Knowledgebase
       
Group: Head Moderator
Posts: 4491
Joined: 29-May 02
From: USA
Member No.: 273
Xbox Version: v1.0
360 version: v3.0 (falcon)

|
before the game, i was saying they had to win last night, and they have to win 1 of their 3 in la if they want to win it all. i'm still thinking that.
i'm also wondering why the league felt it was a good idea to
1. make it all 9pm games so half the east coast is in bed when they are playing, instead of determining the time based on home court advantage. 2. why they thought sunday games, when everyone has work and/or school in the morning is better than saturday games 3. why they thought it would be a good idea to give the teams an extra day off when they AREN'T traveling, instead of having the extra day off between games 2 and 3, and games 5 and 6. - game 1 (bos), 2 days off, game 2 (bos), 1 day off game 3 (la), 1 day off, game 4 (la) 2 days off, game 5 (la), 1 day off, game 6 (bos), 1 day off, game 7 (bos), 5 months off.
regardless, games 1 and 2 were awesome
This post has been edited by Reaper527: Jun 9 2008, 03:57 PM
|
|
|
|
| |
| hardcandy |
Jun 10 2008, 09:54 PM
|
X-S X-perience
 
Group: XS-BANNED
Posts: 449
Joined: 25-July 05
Member No.: 236770
Xbox Version: unk
360 version: unknown

|
QUOTE(Reaper527 @ Jun 10 2008, 04:41 PM)  what about the sunday game versus a saturday game?
Don't know. I have a feeling tonight's game will be the best, Kobe will score 40 and the Celtics will have 3 guys in the 20's. OT anyone?
|
|
|
|
| |
|