mike96sc2
Apr 30 2004, 09:38 PM
Rylinkus
Apr 30 2004, 10:33 PM
Minus the wing that kit isn't that bad. Granted it needs to be painted. And rims would be nice.
mike96sc2
Apr 30 2004, 10:41 PM
I agree the kit is nice and removing the wing with a coat of paint it wouldn't look bad.
Unfortunately I saw this kids page before and he deleted his performance page from cardomain. It had him drag racing a vette and claiming how he was able to keep up.
My logic is though if you want to buy a kit that's cool or you want to buy whatever, but if you have the thousands to invest in a wing, kit, and everything else shouldn't a coat of paint enter the picture pretty quickly. I personally consider any body kit on longer than a month without paint ricey. Mine's going on when I can afford to have everything painted, until then I'd like to keep a single colored car.
Rylinkus
Apr 30 2004, 10:48 PM
Agreed, one of the guys I was out with wed has a 250 sx that has been kitted and unpainted for a few months. But he has an excuse. He installed it. Got it prepped. And then 2 days before painting hit an animal and broke the front bumper cover. So he's spent the last few weeks playing with bondo trying to get it all right again before he has it painted. It should look nice.
I agree multicolored cars are lame as hell. I just think it COULD look nice if he finished it properly.
ravage73
May 3 2004, 08:14 PM
tuners suck, i leave those guys in the dust on my cbr 600.
mike96sc2
May 4 2004, 12:00 AM
| QUOTE (ravage73 @ May 3 2004, 04:14 PM) |
| tuners suck, i leave those guys in the dust on my cbr 600. |
I'm sure you do. Thanks for the intelligent post.
Rylinkus
May 4 2004, 12:13 AM
| QUOTE (ravage73 @ May 3 2004, 10:14 PM) |
| tuners suck, i leave those guys in the dust on my cbr 600. |
My Probe has a nice sound system, cup holder, heater, and room for 5. I wonder if a CBR has that.
ravage73
May 4 2004, 08:14 AM
| QUOTE (mike96sc2 @ May 3 2004, 09:00 PM) |
| I'm sure you do. Thanks for the intelligent post. |
dont believe me huh? ask anybody who has a bike, there a lot faster than a car.
so yes, it was intelligent.
Rylinkus
May 4 2004, 08:31 AM
| QUOTE (ravage73 @ May 4 2004, 10:14 AM) |
dont believe me huh? ask anybody who has a bike, there a lot faster than a car. so yes, it was intelligent. |
Which car?
My Camaro comes out maybe a few times a year if it's lucky. But it's pretty fucking fast for those few hours.
Hell I don't know much about the CBR stats, but my Probe isn't a slouch anymore either.
moistness
May 4 2004, 11:46 AM
| QUOTE (Rylinkus @ May 4 2004, 03:13 AM) |
My Probe has a nice sound system, cup holder, heater, and room for 5. I wonder if a CBR has that. |
Dont forget it has a roof too!!
SniperKilla
May 4 2004, 07:34 PM
lemme throw my hat into the ring...
these are all personal pics i took on easter sunday 2003





that last green civic is my next door neighbors.. its still fugly

he added some gay rims to it now..
iwinulose
May 4 2004, 08:02 PM
if ricers ruled the world:
pic1pic2pic3pic4check them out
their funny
lol
ravage73
May 4 2004, 08:49 PM
| QUOTE (Rylinkus @ May 4 2004, 05:31 AM) |
Which car?
My Camaro comes out maybe a few times a year if it's lucky. But it's pretty fucking fast for those few hours.
Hell I don't know much about the CBR stats, but my Probe isn't a slouch anymore either. |
i could easily beat a camaro and a probe. im sure there fast, but no match for a bike.
im not trying to talk like a bad ass here, but you guys need to feel real speed with no seatbelts, no roofs, no cubholders, no systems, just you the bike and the road. ive gotten my bike up to 165 redlining at 13k. (and this is only with a 600)
SniperKilla that stang looks tight!
SniperKilla
May 4 2004, 09:34 PM
| QUOTE (ravage73 @ May 4 2004, 09:49 PM) |
| SniperKilla that stang looks tight! |
i can only hope that was a sick sick joke
ravage73
May 4 2004, 11:48 PM
| QUOTE (SniperKilla @ May 4 2004, 06:34 PM) |
| i can only hope that was a sick sick joke |
then why did you waste time taking a pic of it?
mike96sc2
May 5 2004, 12:10 AM
| QUOTE (ravage73 @ May 4 2004, 07:48 PM) |
then why did you waste time taking a pic of it? |
Um, because this is a thread showcasing ricers dumbass.
That Mustang looks awful, I like the "CEMAN" intake. I wonder if the sticker fell off or if he really just bought a knock off.
Also why the hell does anyone paint their rear drums, drum brakes aren't cool, they're like anti-speed and performance. Yet people continue to paint them.
Edit: I painted my calipers all around but that was because I did the drum to disc conversion and I was proud to show I did it.
ravage73
May 5 2004, 12:15 AM
| QUOTE |
| Um, because this is a thread showcasing ricers dumbass. |
a mustang is not a ricer. so whos the dumbass now. that comment was uncalled for.
mike96sc2
May 5 2004, 02:12 AM
| QUOTE (ravage73 @ May 4 2004, 08:15 PM) |
a mustang is not a ricer. so whos the dumbass now. that comment was uncalled for. |
Edit: nothing nice to say, but rice can be domestic too, or else rice would be a racist term
Rylinkus
May 5 2004, 02:40 AM
| QUOTE (ravage73 @ May 4 2004, 10:49 PM) |
i could easily beat a camaro and a probe. im sure there fast, but no match for a bike. im not trying to talk like a bad ass here, but you guys need to feel real speed with no seatbelts, no roofs, no cubholders, no systems, just you the bike and the road. ive gotten my bike up to 165 redlining at 13k. (and this is only with a 600)
SniperKilla that stang looks tight! |
Well I asked you for stats and you didn't give them, so I had to find them myself. And from what I've dug up my Camaro is most definately a match for your bike. 1/4 mile times are very similar. I don't really think top speed is indicative, but I know the Camaro goes over 160 as I've been in the car when the previous owner had it over 160.
Argueably my Probe would be outmatched on any straight road. Maybe in corners I may have some shot, but that's about it.
You really need to get your head out of your ass though. To think every tuned car is shit because you drive a motorcycle is pretty ignorant. There are plenty of very nicely tuned cars that are just as fast as your bike. And if it's all about buying a superior vehichle to start with then why a CBR when there are faster bikes on the market?
Also, rice is used on any car that is tastlessly done. I'm sure that the Stang applies. The wing and rims can't do anything for the car's perfomance beyond adding weight. I think it's ugly as sin. The Celica is far worse though. Why would anyone want to draw attenion to their rear drums?
And let's try and keep the name calling to a minimum.
ravage73
May 5 2004, 08:12 AM
you guys are the ones being dicks, not me.
| QUOTE |
| Hell I don't know much about the CBR stats |
it didnt look like you were asking for stats, sorry.
Rylinkus
May 5 2004, 09:17 AM
You're the one who said......
| QUOTE |
| tuners suck, i leave those guys in the dust on my cbr 600. |
I'm merely pointing out there are car's just as fast as your bike. I'm sorry if that's being a dick.
Thinking a 11 second motorcycle is faster then all cars is just as ignorant as thinking a 17 second civic with wings, decal, and exhaust is faster then most cars. In my mind being a ricer requires the proper frame of mind. This attitude is it.
ravage73
May 5 2004, 07:38 PM
| QUOTE (Rylinkus @ May 5 2004, 06:17 AM) |
You're the one who said......
I'm merely pointing out there are car's just as fast as your bike. I'm sorry if that's being a dick.
Thinking a 11 second motorcycle is faster then all cars is just as ignorant as thinking a 17 second civic with wings, decal, and exhaust is faster then most cars. In my mind being a ricer requires the proper frame of mind. This attitude is it. |
well, i take back that quote that tuners suck. maybe the fact that i beat a lot of them has boosted my ego. ive never taken my bike to the track, so i dont know how quick it really is. but it is not a stock bike, it has a lot of racing parts. i respect any "true" racer, so no disrespect to those guys.
Rylinkus
May 6 2004, 01:17 AM
Just out of curiosity what have you done to the bike, and whats the exact year and model. The specs on them vary year to year. I've never been on a CBR and was trying to get a feel for where ti would sit compared to what I have ridden. It looks pretty damn quick in any case, but I was just wondering details. Hell pics if you got them.
ravage73
May 6 2004, 05:13 PM
| QUOTE (Rylinkus @ May 5 2004, 10:17 PM) |
| Just out of curiosity what have you done to the bike, and whats the exact year and model. The specs on them vary year to year. I've never been on a CBR and was trying to get a feel for where ti would sit compared to what I have ridden. It looks pretty damn quick in any case, but I was just wondering details. Hell pics if you got them. |
its a 96 f3. i bought it before i got married. it already had racing carbs on it (4 of them)
so i dont know what brand they are. i put a full two bros racing exaust on, plus a full sharkskinz body. the cbr's are great bikes, very quick and very responsive. when i get it up to about 6k rpm's in 3rd gear, it takes off like a rocket. im not going to post pics of a bike here since that would F** up mike96sc2's topic of showcasing ricers. ill start another tread showcasing bikes one i get my cam from my sis in law. the riding position is very comfy, they are not like the r1's or some other bikes witch have very agressive riding positions. if you dont have a bike you should really get one. well worth the money. im looking to buy a kawasaki zx6rr.
Rylinkus
May 7 2004, 11:06 AM
There's a users ride therad or 2 going on in this forum. "To the Xboxmobile" and another. Just add to one of those and we can trya nd keep this forum cleaner. Some pics of the biek would be cool. My one of friends has a Hayabusa. I can't really say much, outside of wow. I'd be sure to kill myself on it though. I prefer 4 tires.......
Xboxman20
May 7 2004, 11:32 AM
| QUOTE (iwinulose @ May 4 2004, 01:02 PM) |
if ricers ruled the world: pic1 pic2 pic3 pic4
check them out their funny lol |
Most of those are if Muscle Car OwnersOwned the world You dont see rice rocket pos having big block chevys in thier cars do u then why would they put them on a lawn mower? lol Funny tho but THeyw ould have the ntegra type r motor sitting ntheir with Nitro n shit
jesterrace777
May 7 2004, 07:26 PM
| QUOTE (ravage73 @ May 4 2004, 10:14 AM) |
dont believe me huh? ask anybody who has a bike, there a lot faster than a car. so yes, it was intelligent. |
Comparing a bike to a car is fucking stupid. Of course a bike that weighs 300-400 pounds is going to get up and go faster than a 2,000+ pound car. As mentioned a car has more seating capacity, heater for colder months and you can have a nice sound system. Oh yeah and any time you want to compare the crash/survival rates for bikes vs. cars, you let me know. Don't get me wrong I like motorcycles but thinking someone isn't a real racer because they race cars and not bikes is just plain dumb. Anyways, back on topic. I agree that multi-colored cars and in particular, peoples' obsession with the car-wreck grey/rough textured look is the dumbest style ever to enter the auto-tuning world.
ravage73
May 8 2004, 12:50 AM
| QUOTE (jesterrace777 @ May 7 2004, 04:26 PM) |
| Comparing a bike to a car is fucking stupid. Of course a bike that weighs 300-400 pounds is going to get up and go faster than a 2,000+ pound car. As mentioned a car has more seating capacity, heater for colder months and you can have a nice sound system. Oh yeah and any time you want to compare the crash/survival rates for bikes vs. cars, you let me know. Don't get me wrong I like motorcycles but thinking someone isn't a real racer because they race cars and not bikes is just plain dumb. Anyways, back on topic. I agree that multi-colored cars and in particular, peoples' obsession with the car-wreck grey/rough textured look is the dumbest style ever to enter the auto-tuning world. |
so glad you could clear this up.
jesterrace777
May 8 2004, 01:35 AM
No problem.
ravage73
Jul 5 2004, 02:02 AM
| QUOTE (Rylinkus @ May 5 2004, 10:17 PM) |
| Just out of curiosity what have you done to the bike, and whats the exact year and model. The specs on them vary year to year. I've never been on a CBR and was trying to get a feel for where ti would sit compared to what I have ridden. It looks pretty damn quick in any case, but I was just wondering details. Hell pics if you got them. |
finally got my cam back. check "to the xbox mobile thread" to see my bike.
MeNaCe911
Jul 5 2004, 03:30 AM
that dudes car is multicolor because its primed...gotta do that before u paint it...bodykits when they are first got are usually baby blue...the wing is ugly but it helps speed wise...
i live in miami so i see my share of paycheck cars...im not gonna invest too much money on my ride so i can get me a wrx as soon as i can
btw any bike...even choppers (if both are stock) will take a car...weight distribution is too different...plus the take off...manuverbility...just common sense...
and dude ur camero cant come close to the cbr...im not boostin this dudes ego or on his dick but this is a racing bike against a american muscle heavy biaaa lol and the probe will never take any bike on turns
oh and my boys hyabusa will smoke ur cbr:)
V8rx7
Jul 5 2004, 09:29 AM
all those cars are really gay.....body kits or not....stop wasting money and put them intto the engine bay...unless you have all the power you can get out of the engine then you shouldn't waste your money on things that won't make the car faster.
and i am buying a cbr 929rr.....used to have a ducatti 996....bet i could take both the probe and camaro!! even will give you a head start.....the cbr 929rr will have new performance parts as soon as i get my hands on it (nitrous is fun on a bike

)
ravage73
Jul 5 2004, 01:41 PM
| QUOTE (MeNaCe911 @ Jul 5 2004, 12:30 AM) |
that dudes car is multicolor because its primed...gotta do that before u paint it...bodykits when they are first got are usually baby blue...the wing is ugly but it helps speed wise...
i live in miami so i see my share of paycheck cars...im not gonna invest too much money on my ride so i can get me a wrx as soon as i can
btw any bike...even choppers (if both are stock) will take a car...weight distribution is too different...plus the take off...manuverbility...just common sense...
and dude ur camero cant come close to the cbr...im not boostin this dudes ego or on his dick but this is a racing bike against a american muscle heavy biaaa lol and the probe will never take any bike on turns
oh and my boys hyabusa will smoke ur cbr:) |
yes i know a hyabusa would smoke me. its twice the size!
and the 929rr is a sweet bike.
MeNaCe911
Jul 5 2004, 01:45 PM
love those 996...like riding air their soooo light
radams58
Jul 6 2004, 01:20 AM
Ohhhh my, where to begin...
First and foremost the I have greatest respect for those who are willing to tune their cars.
Second my automotive pedigree:
1986 Z28 Camaro - 345bhp/327cid/12.8et
1989 Corvette Z51 - 422bhp/350cid/12.3et (Traction issues)
1999 BMW M3 - 202bhp/191cid/14.3et (Road & Track)
(All bhp ratings are at the wheels)
As yet the M is unmodified due to its status as my baby and grocery getter, the 'Vette just did NOT have enough traction (ie Driver Error).
[BIKES]
Having said all of this I speak from some experience in the tuner world. In my race crew we had an unmodded CBR600 F3, it was quick and had us all off the line. BUT the Grand National (worked), the WS6 TA (stock), and the RX-7 (mildly worked) could all chew it apart from the century mark on.
[RICERS]
Very high level of irritation with them, BECAUSE, they have very little respect for effort and very little knowledge of the mechanics and physics that go into speed. There is a local Honda tuner shop started up by some acquaintences from HS, and the BUILD Hondas. They know their subject and they work the cars.
[CONCLUSION]
Now having said all of this any Honda owner who believes in function over form, understands valve timing and lope separation, and can tell the difference between an 'Intake Pipe' and an actual 'Intake' is welcome at my table.
Trouble is they're few and far between and generally own a sports car to which they've applied said knowledge.
Just my thoughts on the matter.
ravage73
Jul 6 2004, 02:36 AM
| QUOTE (radams58 @ Jul 5 2004, 10:20 PM) |
Ohhhh my, where to begin...
First and foremost the I have greatest respect for those who are willing to tune their cars.
Second my automotive pedigree:
1986 Z28 Camaro - 345bhp/327cid/12.8et 1989 Corvette Z51 - 422bhp/350cid/12.3et (Traction issues) 1999 BMW M3 - 202bhp/191cid/14.3et (Road & Track) (All bhp ratings are at the wheels)
As yet the M is unmodified due to its status as my baby and grocery getter, the 'Vette just did NOT have enough traction (ie Driver Error).
[BIKES] Having said all of this I speak from some experience in the tuner world. In my race crew we had an unmodded CBR600 F3, it was quick and had us all off the line. BUT the Grand National (worked), the WS6 TA (stock), and the RX-7 (mildly worked) could all chew it apart from the century mark on.
[RICERS] Very high level of irritation with them, BECAUSE, they have very little respect for effort and very little knowledge of the mechanics and physics that go into speed. There is a local Honda tuner shop started up by some acquaintences from HS, and the BUILD Hondas. They know their subject and they work the cars.
[CONCLUSION] Now having said all of this any Honda owner who believes in function over form, understands valve timing and lope separation, and can tell the difference between an 'Intake Pipe' and an actual 'Intake' is welcome at my table.
Trouble is they're few and far between and generally own a sports car to which they've applied said knowledge.
Just my thoughts on the matter. |
my only problem with tuners is that 90% of them are just stock cars with wings, a pep boys muffler, and some discount auto parts sickers. real racing tuners are very rare. too many fake ass posers. like i said before, i respect real tuner racers.
tommy2hotty
Jul 6 2004, 02:28 PM
| QUOTE (ravage73 @ Jul 6 2004, 04:36 AM) |
| my only problem with tuners is that 90% of them are just stock cars with wings, a pep boys muffler, and some discount auto parts sickers. real racing tuners are very rare. too many fake ass posers. like i said before, i respect real tuner racers. |
Wow you just defined a ricer.. This thread was started to show pictures of the people you just described. Too bad it only took you 3 pages to figure it out...
And speaking of rice have you seen the bike on this forums with the blue flames on it
ravage73
Jul 6 2004, 11:47 PM
| QUOTE (tommy2hotty @ Jul 6 2004, 11:28 AM) |
Wow you just defined a ricer.. This thread was started to show pictures of the people you just described. Too bad it only took you 3 pages to figure it out...
And speaking of rice have you seen the bike on this forums with the blue flames on it |
hey, i have cleared up my beef with the guys on this thread. i was responding
to radams58's post.
and about the bike... it is not stock, the motor has been bored out, it also has a FULL 2 brothers exaust, 4 upgraded carbs, a sharkskinz body, and the flames are not stickers.
mike96sc2
Jul 7 2004, 01:02 AM
| QUOTE (MeNaCe911 @ Jul 4 2004, 11:30 PM) |
that dudes car is multicolor because its primed...gotta do that before u paint it...bodykits when they are first got are usually baby blue...the wing is ugly but it helps speed wise...
i live in miami so i see my share of paycheck cars...im not gonna invest too much money on my ride so i can get me a wrx as soon as i can |
Correction, the car is half-primed possibly less than that even. I didn't know this kid when I posted those pics, but I've met him since.
He's changed his ways, the dumb wing is gone and the car is looking to get painted soon. He realized how dumb it was to go through all that because the car looked like ass. Once it's painted it'll look better, he's also given up on bragging about how he thinks it almost beat a vette in a drag race.
I've got nothing against people doing things to their car as they can afford it, but if you have a decent car don't put the dumb wing on there (which doesn't help speed-wise, it's a front wheel drive car? do the rear wheels need any downforce?) and don't install the body kit until you have the money to paint it. Doing things backwards of half-assed isn't an excuse though, there's too many ricers who have that mentality and it needs to be stopped.
bluedeath
Jul 7 2004, 01:38 AM
I have to jump in. Here is the
Anti-Ricer
Jack Roush edition Stage 3. I am thinking about trading it in for one of the new retros.
kenji urban
Jul 7 2004, 03:33 AM
Hey everyone... he is what i am driving. I would REALLY like to know if people think i fit into the "ricer' category? I doubt i do though...
Bio / Mods: My car is a 1985 Toyota Sprinter ( AE-86 ).
Engine & drivetrain:
* 4A-GE 1.6L twin-cam 20-Valve out of a Jap-spec 1993 (AE-101) Toyota Trueno, converted to RWD. 5 valves per cylinder, Variable Valve Timing and quad throttle bodies all from the factory. Custom alloy bell mouthed ram-tubes to the quad throttle inlet manifold (covered by Unifilter filter socks).
* Split ignition coil packs from a 4A-GZE.
* Custom cold air ducting.
* NGK-R Laser Platinum spark plugs.
* Cypher oil catch can.
* Microtech MTX-8 computer. Rev-cut is set at 9000rpm.
* Exhaust is a custom 4-2-1 HPC ceramic coated extractors & 2.25" piping through a hi-flow 3" cat, all the way to the stainless straight through muffler.
* Jap-spec T-50 alloy case 5 speed gearbox with a custom short shift kit.
* Jap-spec 6.7" LSD with a custom Diff Technics 4.11 center containing billet LSD hats and larger axle bearings.
Suspension:
* GAB 4-way adjustable front coilovers
* TRD 8-way adjustable rear shocks
* K-Mac race-spec rear springs
* K-Mac sway bars front & rear
* Whiteline adjustable panhard rod
* Whiteline front strut tower brace
* Custom alloy roll-center adjusters
* Cusco adjustable strut-top camber plates
Brakes:
* Brakes are 4-piston calipers & 11-inch vented rotors from a Mazda RX-7 Series IV (FC3S) Turbo on the front.
* Jap-spec disc brakes on the rear
* all running EBC kevlar pads w/ AP Racing fluid.
Interior:
* Full retrim in black
* w/ red Sparco 'Road' fixed racing buckets,
* Momo steering wheel & gearknob and Sparco alloy pedals.
* Autometer Oil Pressure & Water Temeprature Gauges
Body:
* Full restoration in 2-pack solid black.
* Sparco hood pins.
* Windows tinited to 5%
* Factory boot spoiler
Wheels/Tyres:
* 15" X 7" Performance Superlights
* Falken Azenis ST-115 195/50/15 tyres
Power/Weight:
* 86 Kw (120 HP) at the rear wheels.
* 950 Kg (2000 lbs)
What does everyone think?
Yah? Nah?
tommy2hotty
Jul 7 2004, 04:19 AM
| QUOTE (bluedeath @ Jul 7 2004, 03:38 AM) |
I have to jump in. Here is the Anti-Ricer
Jack Roush edition Stage 3. I am thinking about trading it in for one of the new retros. |
A non functional air scoop??/ Sounds like rice... unless you have an intercooler mounted under the scoop... Anyways whats the difference between a stage 3 roush and the ones that come from the ford dealership... I know the ones straight from ford are nothing but pure cosmetics and maybe some lowering but nothing special...
miazmaticdotcom
Jul 7 2004, 10:24 AM
No one has pics of ricers with their neons turned on?
DeXoy
Jul 7 2004, 10:38 AM
http://www.riceboypage.com/I know that site is old, but they got some funny pics of ricers on that site.
bluedeath
Jul 7 2004, 01:17 PM
| QUOTE (tommy2hotty @ Jul 7 2004, 06:19 AM) |
| A non functional air scoop??/ Sounds like rice... unless you have an intercooler mounted under the scoop... Anyways whats the difference between a stage 3 roush and the ones that come from the ford dealership... I know the ones straight from ford are nothing but pure cosmetics and maybe some lowering but nothing special... |
It's the rally along with cold air induction.
The Stage 3 Sport package includes a Roush 4.6L SOHC Supercharged Powertrain, Roush PBR Brake system, and dramatically styled exterior package.
The Stage 3 Rally version includes all the features offered in the Sport package, then adds the sophisticated Roush V-8 suspension system, 18” wheels, racing-style alloy pedals and white-faced gauges, all thoughtfully designed and engineered to balance performance and ride quality.
The diference was $11,000.
tommy2hotty
Jul 7 2004, 01:23 PM
| QUOTE (bluedeath @ Jul 7 2004, 03:17 PM) |
It's the rally along with cold air induction.
The Stage 3 Sport package includes a Roush 4.6L SOHC Supercharged Powertrain, Roush PBR Brake system, and dramatically styled exterior package.
The Stage 3 Rally version includes all the features offered in the Sport package, then adds the sophisticated Roush V-8 suspension system, 18” wheels, racing-style alloy pedals and white-faced gauges, all thoughtfully designed and engineered to balance performance and ride quality.
The diference was $11,000. |
OK so you are telling me that underneath the scoop is a cold air intake... it doesn't seem too practical to put a CAI right above a hot engine to get heat soaked.
lookformeb
Jul 7 2004, 01:39 PM
bluedeath
Jul 7 2004, 01:47 PM
The cold air intake is not located underneath the scoop. Looking underneath the hood from the front its on the far left.
mike96sc2
Jul 7 2004, 06:01 PM
| QUOTE (bluedeath @ Jul 7 2004, 09:47 AM) |
| The cold air intake is not located underneath the scoop. Looking underneath the hood from the front its on the far left. |
I think the complaint was more of the fake hood scoop and the fake rear brake vents the this generation of Mustang has. Not really disrespecting the car as much as Ford's attempt to put something fake and useless on the car in attempt to make it look cool. Another example would be the new Cavaliers which I swear must come with 40 foot aluminum wings out of the factory nowadays. Maybe that J-Body with the 4 cylinder can make it fly.
tommy2hotty
Jul 7 2004, 06:15 PM
| QUOTE (mike96sc2 @ Jul 7 2004, 08:01 PM) |
| I think the complaint was more of the fake hood scoop and the fake rear brake vents the this generation of Mustang has. Not really disrespecting the car as much as Ford's attempt to put something fake and useless on the car in attempt to make it look cool. Another example would be the new Cavaliers which I swear must come with 40 foot aluminum wings out of the factory nowadays. Maybe that J-Body with the 4 cylinder can make it fly. |
DING DING DING we got a winnAr.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.