This doesn't seem to work:
Full Version: Variables In Variable Names
Scenyx Entertainment Community > Xbox1 Forums > Dashboard Forums > Official MediaXMenu (MXM) Forum > MXM WIP Beta forum
| CODE |
| Set cursorX 1 Set cursorY 1 Set blah%cursorx%%cursory% success msgbox %blah{cursorx}{cursory}% |
But this works:
| CODE |
| Set cursorX 1 Set blah%cursorx% success msgbox %blah{cursorx}% |
Just to let you know, this caused me lots of grief... back to using XMLs for arrays
Doing minesweeper, by the way.
Hmmmm.... I'll have to take a look at the parser for that.
you could also use
| QUOTE |
Set cursorx 1 Set cursory 1 SET XY %cursorx%_%cursory% SET ARRAY1_1 success msgbox %ARRAY{XY}% |
which would work...dunno if its what you need.. just went by your example.
Actually, it would be bad form to squash two variables together like that....
X=11 and Y=1
or X=1 and Y=11
Given the above, there is no difference in the example.
I would recommend putting an underscore between them.
X=11 and Y=1
or X=1 and Y=11
Given the above, there is no difference in the example.
I would recommend putting an underscore between them.
im still an idiot.
updated sample to BJ's recommendation.
i can see that posing a problem with his code if the mine is set at "position" 11
not impossible to work around thoough.. would just have to do some string functions instead of IF# mine == 11
edit 4,222 : but not if the mine was set at position 1_1... still, a string comparison though.
updated sample to BJ's recommendation.
i can see that posing a problem with his code if the mine is set at "position" 11
not impossible to work around thoough.. would just have to do some string functions instead of IF# mine == 11
edit 4,222 : but not if the mine was set at position 1_1... still, a string comparison though.
| QUOTE (koldfuzion @ Jun 1 2004, 11:02 PM) |
| im still an idiot. updated sample to BJ's recommendation. |
Well, it wasn't a direct response to your post, but rather a general observation of good practices.
i didnt really think that far ahead. just tried to find somethng that worked.
but thats why you are in the drivers seat and the rest of us are chasing the car.
but thats why you are in the drivers seat and the rest of us are chasing the car.
I ran into a similar issue in the FileManager.
I see what you mean about bad form, but by chance, I guess, I have a 10x10 board 
(but I will probably have different sizes for difficulty levels)
kf's example would work. But xml doesn't need an extra line
And I have a superstition xml is faster than just using tons of variables, for a 2d array (non-linear search as opposed to linear search, unless the variable routines do smart searching)
<ignore this>
1
--1
--2
--3
2
--1
--2
--3
3
--1
--2
--3
1_1
1_2
1_3
2_1
2_2
2_3
3_1
3_2
3_3
(but I will probably have different sizes for difficulty levels)kf's example would work. But xml doesn't need an extra line
And I have a superstition xml is faster than just using tons of variables, for a 2d array (non-linear search as opposed to linear search, unless the variable routines do smart searching)
<ignore this>
1
--1
--2
--3
2
--1
--2
--3
3
--1
--2
--3
1_1
1_2
1_3
2_1
2_2
2_3
3_1
3_2
3_3
In windows minesweeper, whenever a '0' box (without any adjacent mines) is clicked, a whole area 'opens up', for all adjacent '0' boxes.
Wondering how to do the recursion in script, without using an array as a makeshift stack to keep track of the recursion. Any ideas?
Wondering how to do the recursion in script, without using an array as a makeshift stack to keep track of the recursion. Any ideas?
Third post.. oh well
Think it's this:
Think it's this:
| QUOTE |
| CStdString GetTrueEnvName( LPCTSTR szVar, TMapStrings * pLocal ) { ... iPos = sReturn.Find( _T('{') ); tcEndChar = _T('}'); } if ( iPos > -1 ) { // OK, find end bracket... int iEndPos = sReturn.ReverseFind( tcEndChar ); |
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.